X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 107

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    24th September 04
    Location
    Victoria, BC Canada 48° 25' 47.31"N 123° 20' 4.59" W
    Posts
    4,360
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    In answer to the question - I'm not much of a fur guy. I have nothing against fur, it's just not me.
    The sporran in the photo is smooth, highly polished leather. It has a chrome formal cantle, not a leather one. This is the most formal sporran I own.

    This is also the only time I have ever worn Ghillie Brogues. I don't care for them much. I now wear highly polished Brogued Oxfords for everything but the most formal occasions when I may switch to spit shined, plain oxfords without the broguing.

    I have never worn a fly plaid. And won't.

    I also do not own an Argyle jacket. I wear a jacket cut for a kilt but without the military influence. Dark charcoal Tweed with horn buttons in the daytime and Black Barathea but with black buttons in the evening.

    Personal preference & KISS
    Last edited by Steve Ashton; 30th May 18 at 05:35 PM.
    Steve Ashton
    Forum Owner

  2. The Following 4 Users say 'Aye' to Steve Ashton For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    24th February 15
    Location
    East Coast U.S.
    Posts
    48
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Ashton View Post

    This is also the only time I have ever worn Ghillie Brogues. I don't care for them much.
    I agree! However, would buckle brogues be too over-the-top with black tie/Prince Charlie?

  4. #3
    Join Date
    6th July 07
    Location
    The Highlands,Scotland.
    Posts
    15,807
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by 230Ball View Post
    I agree! However, would buckle brogues be too over-the-top with black tie/Prince Charlie?
    It depends on the event. For most black tie events the buckle brogues would be too much. Apart from the ultra formal black tie event well polished black oxfords will do you nicely. A wee observation, most new to kilt attire tend to overdress for black tie events.
    " Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.

  5. The Following User Says 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Join Date
    24th February 15
    Location
    East Coast U.S.
    Posts
    48
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks, Jock, this is getting easier!

  7. #5
    Join Date
    24th September 04
    Location
    Victoria, BC Canada 48° 25' 47.31"N 123° 20' 4.59" W
    Posts
    4,360
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just so we are all using the same terms.

    The word brogue and its plural broguing refer to the pattern of holes punched into a shoe.

    When I was growing up we considered any shoe with the pattern of holes to be one level down in formality from a shoe without the pattern of holes. In general, we thought of all brogues as day wear shoes.
    This has gradually undergone a change and you now see brogued shoes at formal events.

    (A brogue in the UK is what in the US is sometimes called a 'Wing Tip"
    An oxford shoe is one where the bottom of the laces are closed.
    If the bottom of the laces are open the term is 'Blucher'.)

    But I still feel that a plain shoe (without the pattern of holes) to be more formal.

    I personally do not own any buckled shoes. They come across to 'costumey' to me. Too much a part of the Laird's Plaide/Cromach look which, I personally, do not wear.

    If I were looking for a very formal shoe this is what I would wear - Patent Leather or polished to a shine that you could see yourself in (A Spitshine).



    But everything I have said is my own personal preference. I do not ask, nor expect, anyone else to follow anything I say.
    Steve Ashton
    Forum Owner

  8. The Following 6 Users say 'Aye' to Steve Ashton For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Join Date
    24th February 15
    Location
    East Coast U.S.
    Posts
    48
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Excellent, Steve! I think we're on the same freq.
    BTW, is there a specific weight of hose recommended for dress oxfords? My novice assumption is that hose typically worn with Ghillie Brogues would be too thick or clunky looking with oxfords... like wearing boot socks.

  10. #7
    Join Date
    24th September 04
    Location
    Victoria, BC Canada 48° 25' 47.31"N 123° 20' 4.59" W
    Posts
    4,360
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yes, kilt hose are usually thicker than standard dress socks.

    The fix - buy larger shoes that fit.

    Most old school shoe stores will ask you to bring the socks you are going to wear with the shoes with you when you try the shoes on.

    See, I just showed my age again. Who has even seen a shoe store today where they actually sat down and measured your feet before going in the back and pulling that size off the shelf?

    This is called a Brannock Device. At one time you did not buy a pair of shoes where a clerk would not put both of your feet in one of these. (yes, it is quite common for one foot to be larger than the other)

    ]

    This one device take 3 different measurements at one time. The length or size, plus the width, plus the arch length.
    Last edited by Steve Ashton; 31st May 18 at 02:07 PM.
    Steve Ashton
    Forum Owner

  11. The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to Steve Ashton For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Terry Searl is offline Registration terminated at the member's request
    Join Date
    13th September 07
    Location
    Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    546
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    I've asked before

    I've asked the question before on other threads but never seen an actual reply
    What is it about Gillie Brogues that make them offensive to some people .......other than the laces, which can be shortened.

  13. The Following User Says 'Aye' to Terry Searl For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Join Date
    24th September 04
    Location
    Victoria, BC Canada 48° 25' 47.31"N 123° 20' 4.59" W
    Posts
    4,360
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I personally find that the lack of a tongue make the laces dig into the top of my foot.

    That is the purpose of the tongue inside a shoe. To keep the laces from leaving big gouges in the top of the foot. Ghillies are basically just a Brogued Oxford where the tongue is cut out and there are cutouts around the lace holes. All of that is just very uncomfortable on the top of my foot.
    Steve Ashton
    Forum Owner

  15. #10
    Join Date
    4th November 17
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    289
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Terry Searl View Post
    I've asked the question before on other threads but never seen an actual reply
    What is it about Gillie Brogues that make them offensive to some people .......other than the laces, which can be shortened.
    This is really a great question Terry, I'm very interested in hearing the answers too, even though I don't particularly care for the shoes. I would also like to know if the Ghille Brogue is THE official kilt shoe or not. If so, when did it become so and who decided it was?
    Last edited by tokareva; 31st May 18 at 03:39 PM.

  16. The Following User Says 'Aye' to tokareva For This Useful Post:


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0