-
21st March 19, 09:35 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by Tarheel
I see you're in Virginia where it may not get cold enough to often need a fly plaid. A simple but elegant ensemble can be put together with fewer extra items to keep up with (ie. dirk, sword and baldrick, etc) and be acceptable to host even the best guests in a variety of settings.
In Scotland if one was meeting a VIP in an official civilian capacity at a Highland Games, for example, then a tweed argyll,shirt and tie, kilt of course, day sporran, plain coloured hose and black brogues are quite sufficient. The only slightly unusual addition that might be added could perhaps be a balmoral bonnet.
All this swords, dirks, plaids and shiny baubles stuff,is nothing more than pure brigadoonary in most cases. However, I would not necessarily include the cromach in that category.
Last edited by Jock Scot; 22nd March 19 at 12:02 AM.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
The Following 12 Users say 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
Baeau,Bruce Scott,Delta Six,EagleJCS,Father Bill,kilted redleg,kilted scholar,Kiltem in NM,ThistleDown,Tobus,Tomo,tripleblessed
-
22nd March 19, 12:14 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
In Scotland if one was meeting a VIP in an official civilian capacity at a Highland Games, for example, then a tweed argyll,shirt and tie, kilt of course, day sporran, plain coloured hose and black brogues are quite sufficient. The only slightly unusual addition that might be added could perhaps be a balmoral bonnet.
All this swords, dirks, plaids and shiny baubles stuff,is nothing more than pure brigadoonary in most cases. However, I would not necessarily include the cromach in that category.
I agree completely Jock. I've never worn a Fly Plaid and cannot conceive of an event when I might. It’s a piece of Highland Revival frippery that has no practical use so far as I’m concerned. And year, apart from some of those dreadful Hire Shop outfits, is a rare beast in Scotland these days.
-
The Following 9 Users say 'Aye' to figheadair For This Useful Post:
-
22nd March 19, 01:27 AM
#3
Pipers maybe... otherwise I can't see the need or the desire to wear a fly plaid
-
-
22nd March 19, 05:21 AM
#4
An impractical accessory
 Originally Posted by figheadair
It’s a piece of Highland Revival frippery that has no practical use so far as I’m concerned.
There's a USA Kilts video that convinced me that a fly plaid is a really impractical accessory.
The key points I took away from the video:
- It looks awesome in photos.
- It's a pain to wear, because it pulls up on that corner of your jacket.
- You shouldn't wear it as a guest to a wedding, because you'll upstage the groom.
- Even at Rocky's wedding, he wore the fly plaid for the ceremony and the photos, then took it off for the rest of the evening.
-
-
22nd March 19, 05:27 AM
#5
Were I asked to be the guest of honour at a black tie event where others would be kilted, I would remotely consider wearing an evening plaid. I probably would not consider it for very long, however, since it's an unneeded and fairly ostentatious accessory.
I'd think for this day and age, a day plaid is nearing anachronism, even for Scottish armigers.
-
-
22nd March 19, 05:57 AM
#6
Commonest?
I just have to ask as this is the second time in a very short period that I have seen this word. When did "commonest" become a word? Should it not be "most common?" Is this one of those "two countries divided by a common language" things?
Cheers,
David
"The opposite of faith is not doubt. Doubt is central to faith. The opposite of faith is certainty."
Ken Burns
-
The Following 4 Users say 'Aye' to kiltedsawyer For This Useful Post:
-
22nd March 19, 06:24 AM
#7
 Originally Posted by kiltedsawyer
I just have to ask as this is the second time in a very short period that I have seen this word. When did "commonest" become a word? Should it not be "most common?" Is this one of those "two countries divided by a common language" things?
Cheers,
David
You're probably right. Given Scotty Thompson was not in the first flush of youth when he wrote the book it's obviously not one of those dreadful modernisms, for example, the use of impact in place of affect.
-
-
22nd March 19, 07:26 AM
#8
 Originally Posted by kiltedsawyer
I just have to ask as this is the second time in a very short period that I have seen this word. When did "commonest" become a word? Should it not be "most common?" Is this one of those "two countries divided by a common language" things?
Cheers,
David
https://ell.stackexchange.com/questi...-the-commonest
Interesting read on that
Drink to the fame of it -- The Tartan!
Murdoch Maclean
-
The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to Highland Logan For This Useful Post:
-
22nd March 19, 08:23 AM
#9
Smart Policy
 Originally Posted by Highland Logan
So we should join together to prevent "commonest" infiltration of our language.
-
-
22nd March 19, 01:09 PM
#10
I think it is to differentiate the use of the word.
Common can be derogatory so possibly the use of commonest is to move the meaning towards frequent - as in 'the commonest description was his behaving like a common little oik'.
Anne the Pleater
I presume to dictate to no man what he shall eat or drink or wherewithal he shall be clothed."
-- The Hon. Stuart Ruaidri Erskine, The Kilt & How to Wear It, 1901.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Pleater For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks