-
18th July 25, 02:47 PM
#1
Of course bespoke sporrans could always have been made at any time, and it's always possible a small boutique maker could have made anything at any time.
But as far as what can be documented, what is seen is that Day sporrans were brown up until around 1980.
It coincides with the rise of Kilt Hire adopting the black Prince Charlie + black Ghillies costume, and Pipe Bands adopting the black Argyll + black Ghillies + black Glengarry costume.
BTW in the military it started becoming the fashion in the 1960s (as best I can tell) for the soldiers to turn their brown-issued sporrans black. The MOD relented and started issuing hideous black Courlene sporrans at some point.
I have a collection of catalogues going from around 1906 up through around 1980 and black sporrans aren't pictured or mentioned.
Well "around 1980". The earliest evidence I have of black sporrans being sold is a 1978 catalogue that lists 14 sporran styles in brown and 2 in black, a snapshot of the beginning of the Kilt Hire black sporran thing.
A 1983 catalogue lists 12 Day styles, all brown, with a footnote saying that a few of them are available in black for extra cost.
This 1983 catalogue also is the first evidence I've seen of what we call "semi-dress" sporrans. They call them "Day/Evening Wear" and offer four styles. It's another snapshot of how Kilt Hire was about to change the face of Highland Dress.
As far as imagery is concerned I haven't seen a photo that conclusively shows a black sporran prior to the rise of Kilt Hire. Thing is, an extremely dark brown had long been a popular colour. I've repeatedly seen these sold on Ebay being described as black by the seller, though in the photos it's clear that they're dark brown.
People have also pointed to an old photo or two saying they show a black sporran, though from such photos it's impossible to know.
Like any historian I say "show me the evidence" (unambiguous dated photo, dated catalogue mentioning sporran colour, dated bill of sale mentioning sporran colour, etc.)
Even if one or two documented black sporrans are presented it doesn't change the fact that 99% (if not more) were brown. This very thread includes mention of a brown sporran being turned black by the owner, something else to consider. A friend of mine did the same thing with a lovely ginger Hunting sporran I sold him.
Last edited by OC Richard; 18th July 25 at 02:50 PM.
Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte
-
-
18th July 25, 03:59 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by OC Richard
This very thread includes mention of a brown sporran being turned black by the owner, something else to consider. .
Guilty. But not feeling too guilty. 
And you have first person written documentation up above.
"There is no merit in being wet and/or cold and sartorial elegance take second place to common sense." Jock Scot
-
-
18th July 25, 06:47 PM
#3
I now own a dress sporran.
20250718_203920sm.jpg
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to geomick For This Useful Post:
-
18th July 25, 07:53 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by geomick
That's a beauty. Is that bovine fur?
-
-
18th July 25, 08:09 PM
#5
black springbok from Afro-Celtic
https://afrocelticsporrans.com/
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to geomick For This Useful Post:
-
18th July 25, 10:37 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by geomick
Springbok! I don't feel bad for guessing wrong 😂
-
-
19th July 25, 07:42 AM
#7
 Originally Posted by OC Richard
Of course bespoke sporrans could always have been made at any time, and it's always possible a small boutique maker could have made anything at any time.
But as far as what can be documented, what is seen is that Day sporrans were brown up until around 1980.
It coincides with the rise of Kilt Hire adopting the black Prince Charlie + black Ghillies costume, and Pipe Bands adopting the black Argyll + black Ghillies + black Glengarry costume.
BTW in the military it started becoming the fashion in the 1960s (as best I can tell) for the soldiers to turn their brown-issued sporrans black. The MOD relented and started issuing hideous black Courlene sporrans at some point.
I have a collection of catalogues going from around 1906 up through around 1980 and black sporrans aren't pictured or mentioned.
Well "around 1980". The earliest evidence I have of black sporrans being sold is a 1978 catalogue that lists 14 sporran styles in brown and 2 in black, a snapshot of the beginning of the Kilt Hire black sporran thing.
A 1983 catalogue lists 12 Day styles, all brown, with a footnote saying that a few of them are available in black for extra cost.
This 1983 catalogue also is the first evidence I've seen of what we call "semi-dress" sporrans. They call them "Day/Evening Wear" and offer four styles. It's another snapshot of how Kilt Hire was about to change the face of Highland Dress.
As far as imagery is concerned I haven't seen a photo that conclusively shows a black sporran prior to the rise of Kilt Hire. Thing is, an extremely dark brown had long been a popular colour. I've repeatedly seen these sold on Ebay being described as black by the seller, though in the photos it's clear that they're dark brown.
People have also pointed to an old photo or two saying they show a black sporran, though from such photos it's impossible to know.
Like any historian I say "show me the evidence" (unambiguous dated photo, dated catalogue mentioning sporran colour, dated bill of sale mentioning sporran colour, etc.)
Even if one or two documented black sporrans are presented it doesn't change the fact that 99% (if not more) were brown. This very thread includes mention of a brown sporran being turned black by the owner, something else to consider. A friend of mine did the same thing with a lovely ginger Hunting sporran I sold him.
I agree completely.
Which is why the black Scotch-grain Forsyths sporran is puzzling. I acquired it some years ago as part of a house-clearance in Cornwall, England, and all I could learn was that the original own had 'Scottish connections.'
Could it be that he commissioned the thing in black right at the start?
It showed no signs of use at all, so perhaps the owner had it specially made to seem a wee bit smarter than ordinary brown, for his wedding, perhaps, and never wore it again.
I guess we'll never know for sure, but it's one of the exceptions that prove the rule.
-
-
25th July 25, 06:57 PM
#8
Recent eBay purchases, I have a WE Scott black/bovine fur day sporran and an L&M Outfitters Hunting sporran on the way. (both were linked here)
That will give me better examples to study to understand the construction. The brown leather day sporran (bought from Museum Replicas/Atlanta Cutlery) is probably not a good example to follow for construction advice. From a couple of videos and the sporrans I do have, it looks like the gusset is wrapped around the front face. Some even look like it was stitched to the edge and then turned to hide the seam. I need to understand typical construction methods before I start cutting the leather. Based on the comments on the history of day sporran leather color (any shade you want as long as it is brown), I plan to make a pair of similar sporrans - brown leather with tassels and black leather with a carved front face. Both will get the same thistle design for the top flap and a pin closure. I'll post pictures when they are built. Then I will work on a dress sporran in black stingray belly.
-
-
26th July 25, 01:49 AM
#9
Most certainly many shades of brown are the usual colour for a sporran, particularly if you want to go down the fur route and yes, there are many exceptions. These days, certainly in Scotland, animal hair is not as popular as it once was. Conservation issues and personal tastes have changed somewhat around the world and personally, as a hunting , shooting , fishing man, I really don't see the need for NEW fur sporrans these days. Each to their own.
Last edited by Jock Scot; 26th July 25 at 02:17 AM.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
-
26th July 25, 08:52 AM
#10
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
... as a hunting , shooting , fishing man, I really don't see the need for NEW fur sporrans these days. ...
Out of curiosity, what does being a hunting/shooting/fishing man have to do with the need for new fur sporrans? Are you referring to the lack of need for formal sporrans during informal activities, or something else?
Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I think you're keen to keep Scottish traditions alive, and to prevent time from eroding and evolving them. If fur sporran production is halted and then resumed some years later, I imagine there would be consequences in those regards.
I confess, I haven't researched the need for conservation in fur production. But I imagine sporrans don't put a large strain on the system. They're quite small, and worn by only a few. Additionally, some furs as so inexpensive, it seems they may be bordering on being considered a waste product. I know that in Japan they have a deer problem, and culled deer are being discarded, wasting both meat and hide.
Viewing this from a wide perspective, it seems to me that using sustainable furs is the best course of action to keep tradition alive without inflicting damage on the world's ecosystem.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks