Respectfully, your position in this thread is making me think that you're looking for any possible reason to 'dress up' rather than staying within the usual norms. Be careful not to push it too hard.

Originally Posted by
jsrnephdoc
Do we have a good idea HOW they would have dressed for that memorial celebration? Perhaps more relevant, what do we know about how Burns himself dressed, particularly later in his life, after it was clear there was more money to be made from writing wonderful verse than from farming infertile land? And, so far as "costumes" vs. customary semi-formal dress is concerned, couldn't virtually ANY wearing of kilts (except for weddings, graduations, and perhaps clan gatherings) be considered "costuming" rather than "custom," ESPECIALLY in Scotland?
Even at celebrations of Scotland's distinct heritage; e.g., the Royal Military Tattoo, the number of people who show up wearing "modern" kilts or even little bits of tartan is quite small. In that context, one might argue that when the food is ancient and the recitations old, dressing in the manner people did the first time such an event was held might be ENTIRELY appropriate, perhaps even ESPECIALLY if none of the attendees would have been kilted.
After all, events such as Burns night suppers are QUINTESSENTIAL "look-backs," and if those are shoehorned into stringent "rules," we risk forgetting from whence they originated. Such is the state of affairs right now in the USA, where history is being "sanitized" for quite ugly reasons.
Rev'd Father Bill White: Mostly retired Parish Priest & former Elementary Headmaster. Lover of God, dogs, most people, joy, tradition, humour & clarity. Legion Padre, theologian, teacher, philosopher, linguist, encourager of hearts & souls & a firm believer in dignity, decency, & duty. A proud Canadian Sinclair with solid Welsh and other heritage.
Bookmarks