X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
2nd December 06, 08:47 PM
#1
Just my opinion: One Bond. Within the movies, he's had many faces, only due to personnel changes. All the same character, the same man. The prologue to OHMSS is simply a throw away sequence to introduce the audience. Non-canon, just like the original Casino Royale.
Where you stand on Never Say Never Again is personal choice, but I always considered it an enjoyable oddity that fits nicely when not concerned about continuity, just entertainment. I think that's a good idea for modern serial fiction: disregard a continuity and enjoy the storytelling.
Again, just my view. Your mileage may vary.
Will
-
-
2nd December 06, 09:04 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by RedDevilWill
I think that's a good idea for modern serial fiction: disregard a continuity and enjoy the storytelling.
Strict Continuity???????????????
In Bond??????? NEVER!!!!!!!!!!
James Bond has never worried a whole lot about continuity. That way, Moneypenny and Bond are eternal flirting, for 40 YEARS!!!!!
On of the interesting parts of the DK Bond book is the attempt to establish continuity post-facto.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks