|
-
22nd June 07, 01:01 AM
#1
Many witnesses, when asked what someone was wearing, can be vague or general in their answers. How many bulletins have you seen that say something like "the suspect was wearing jeans and a T shirt" etc.
But when the suspect is wearing something more out of the usual such as a kilt they get much more definite.
I look forward to the day when they also have to name the tartan that they were wearing in order to narrow the field of suspects down.
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
-
22nd June 07, 08:54 AM
#2
-
-
22nd June 07, 09:36 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by Ayin McFye

I just got this visual in my head of some guy stating "It was a 30 year old male wearing a Dress MacKenzie tartan, Ancient MacKenzie hose flashes, size 9 gillies, an imitation rabbit fur spooran and he was missing a tassel, and he had a cap on but the badge was a MacPhee I believe"
A fully disreputable charachter to be sure.
An uair a théid an gobhainn air bhathal 'se is feàrr a bhi réidh ris.
(When the smith gets wildly excited, 'tis best to agree with him.)
Kiltio Ergo Sum.
I Kilt, therefore I am. -McClef
-
-
22nd June 07, 10:00 AM
#4
My spouse is a cop and yesterday they got a look-out for an male between the ages of 15 and 50, probably african american but possibley a darkly tanned hispanic or asian, wearing jeans and a hoodie.
That pretty much eliminates only old white ladies from the line-up! Police descriptions can be a real hoot because they get soo vague sometimes.
-
-
22nd June 07, 10:36 AM
#5
 Originally Posted by McClef
I look forward to the day when they also have to name the tartan that they were wearing in order to narrow the field of suspects down.
I thought that was the point? "The man said a man wearing a kilt he did not know..." Emphasis added Clearly, the witness could not ID the tartan!
Ken Sallenger - apprentice kiltmaker, journeyman curmudgeon,
gainfully unemployed systems programmer
-
-
22nd June 07, 01:44 PM
#6
 Originally Posted by McClef
I look forward to the day when they also have to name the tartan that they were wearing in order to narrow the field of suspects down. 
Here! Here! A truly great day indeed.
-
-
22nd June 07, 06:42 PM
#7
 Originally Posted by McClef
Many witnesses, when asked what someone was wearing, can be vague or general in their answers. How many bulletins have you seen that say something like "the suspect was wearing jeans and a T shirt" etc.
But when the suspect is wearing something more out of the usual such as a kilt they get much more definite.
I look forward to the day when they also have to name the tartan that they were wearing in order to narrow the field of suspects down. 
I used this one recently on another thread. (Actually, I think I stole it from here years ago.) Substitute police for Customs.
-
-
23rd June 07, 08:17 AM
#8
Good cartoon Archangel thanks!
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks