X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
8th September 07, 03:59 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by ardchoille
I agree totally. A garment that is machine-made of other than true tartan, and not custom made to the wearer's measurements, is not a kilt. Instead of using the word "kilt", they should use the word "garment". Any kilt is also a garment.. but any garment is not always a kilt regardless of how you dress it up. There is simply no comparison between a Rolls Royce and a Volkswagen Beetle.
But it also stated that it had to be made in Scotland to be called a kilt. What about our Newsome or Tewkesbury? They would be merely handsewn garments? Although they would be of no less quality. This is the first step of Kilt Police (sit down Panache!).
On a lighter side, at one time Rolls Royce was owned by Volkswagen. instead let's compare the VW beetle to a Porsche 356...
-
Similar Threads
-
By Tipperary Inn in forum Kilt Nights
Replies: 58
Last Post: 12th June 07, 03:44 PM
-
By Fearnest in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 0
Last Post: 12th March 07, 07:58 PM
-
By Pour1Malt in forum Comments and Suggestions
Replies: 20
Last Post: 19th February 07, 05:59 PM
-
By Prester John in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 10
Last Post: 22nd November 05, 12:39 PM
-
By Iolaus in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 31
Last Post: 8th April 05, 10:29 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks