X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
17th October 07, 07:54 PM
#11
Nothing scientific to back up my point, but I think the real problem is not that the kilts themselves are too long, but that men wear the top of the kilt too low on their body. It seems to me that mens' clothing, including pants, used to be worn much higher at the natural waist, instead of the hips. Compare the length of kilts from the MOD to most stock kilts. The stock kilts are usually 24", the MOD kilts seemed to be around 26"-27". Still, modern photos of kilted men show the kilt riding lower, even though the rise is less. Also, since many kilts are not properly fitted to the small of the back/rump area, they tend to creep down when one is wearing them, resulting in the "trollopy" look.
Cordially,
David
Last edited by davidlpope; 17th October 07 at 08:15 PM.
-
Similar Threads
-
By andyfg in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 48
Last Post: 13th April 08, 01:59 AM
-
By Mike1 in forum Forum News
Replies: 0
Last Post: 15th September 06, 12:21 PM
-
By Kiltedfirepiper in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 18
Last Post: 10th September 06, 12:32 AM
-
By Cawdorian in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 21
Last Post: 24th February 06, 08:02 PM
-
By Mr. Kilt in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 6
Last Post: 31st December 05, 01:12 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks