X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
22nd November 07, 03:41 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by Kent Frazier
My wife, a friend of ours and I are debating on what makes a kilt "formal". They are saying that there is a difference in the way the kilt is cut, pleated, etc. I said I though the "accessories" (jacket, sporran, etc.) are what makes it formal wear.
Who is correct?
Thanks,
Kent.
Both! It comes back to the question of Traditional and Non-Traditional.
Would you wear a pair of jeans and consider yourself formal? No. But is there any real difference between the cut of a pair of jeans and the cut of a pair of formal pants? No.
Would I wear a Utilikilt or sport kilt with a formal jacket, to a formal affair? No.
But would someone be wrong if they had a utilikilt made from really nice fabric and then wore it with a PC? No, they wouldn't be wrong, but neither would they be traditional.
I have seen black kilts worn with a PC that didn't look bad, but I don't think they looked traditional either.
We now have many cuts of kilts. Any one of which, when made from a nice fabric could be worn with a formal jacket.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Bryan in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 49
Last Post: 15th August 07, 08:48 AM
-
By cessna152towser in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 33
Last Post: 23rd March 07, 04:47 PM
-
By Canuck in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 6
Last Post: 6th November 06, 09:00 AM
-
By O'Neille in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 26
Last Post: 11th September 06, 01:08 PM
-
By usndoc in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 16
Last Post: 23rd September 05, 07:26 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks