-
20th August 08, 04:50 AM
#11
There's a dummy in a window in Leeds that has a waistcoat and belt. I cringe every time I see it.
But I'm not so sure it's the store just trying to sell more stuff. Three piece suits are making a bit of a resurgence, and whenever I see a guy wearing a waistcoat (almost always sans jacket), the trousers are too low and he's wearing a belt. The trousers should be high enough that there's no gap showing shirt between, and they should be held up by braces.
What I don't know is if it's because dress-down is the new formal (I did see an article extolling this), or they just don't know how these elements were made to go together.
An uair a théid an gobhainn air bhathal 'se is feàrr a bhi réidh ris.
(When the smith gets wildly excited, 'tis best to agree with him.)
Kiltio Ergo Sum.
I Kilt, therefore I am. -McClef
-
-
20th August 08, 06:11 AM
#12
 Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome
Hmmm... I don't know if I'd say that as a rule, necessarily. As this thread is about formal wear, one could say you were correct. For formal attire, unless you are wearing a vest or a cummerbund, I'd wear a belt.
However, I don't think that statement is true for casual wear. There are all kinds of circumstances in casual wear where you might not wear a belt. For what it's worth, I'd rather see no belt with casual wear than a dress belt worn with casual wear.
M
I feel the same way, Matt. The buckles are too fancy looking for casual dress. Although, I do wear a plain looking, two prong work belt for a casual look in a lot of cases. I'm usually dressed for casual when I wear a kilt.
Last edited by Bugbear; 20th August 08 at 06:20 AM.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
-
20th August 08, 06:42 AM
#13
 Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome
Hmmm... I don't know if I'd say that as a rule, necessarily. As this thread is about formal wear, one could say you were correct. For formal attire, unless you are wearing a vest or a cummerbund, I'd wear a belt.
However, I don't think that statement is true for casual wear. There are all kinds of circumstances in casual wear where you might not wear a belt. For what it's worth, I'd rather see no belt with casual wear than a dress belt worn with casual wear.
M
 Originally Posted by Ted Crocker
I feel the same way, Matt. The buckles are too fancy looking for casual dress. Although, I do wear a plain looking, two prong work belt for a casual look in a lot of cases. I'm usually dressed for casual when I wear a kilt. 
I have to agree with that. The big shiny buckles do tend to be a bit much for casual wear. (Well, unless you're in Texas, that is )
We're fools whether we dance or not, so we might as well dance. - Japanese Proverb
-
-
20th August 08, 06:50 AM
#14
Ya, the big shiney buckles.
My best friend said they look like you won a wrestling championship if you arent wearing a jacket and tie. Guess you could win a rodeo, but I don't think you should ride a bull in a kilt...
Last edited by Bugbear; 20th August 08 at 06:57 AM.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
Similar Threads
-
By whiteyallthetime in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 13
Last Post: 15th June 08, 10:19 PM
-
By ChromeScholar in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 20
Last Post: 8th November 07, 10:56 PM
-
By SB996 in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 12
Last Post: 28th April 06, 09:12 PM
-
By davedove in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 11
Last Post: 17th January 06, 01:12 PM
-
By Avonlea22 in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 46
Last Post: 22nd December 05, 11:53 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks