X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    2nd July 06
    Location
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,678
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Going with what McMillan said, for a long time Scots didn't have standardized spelling. In fact, most of the time it's wasn't written at all. Except on a few occasions (Robert Burns) it was exclusively spoken language. That is what makes it so difficult to write. Nowadays, the Ulster-Scots Agency (Tha Boord O' Ulster-Scots) is working to standardize the spelling, but it's still a good ways away.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    22nd March 07
    Location
    In Doors
    Posts
    897
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by beloitpiper View Post
    Going with what McMillan said, for a long time Scots didn't have standardized spelling. In fact, most of the time it's wasn't written at all. Except on a few occasions (Robert Burns) it was exclusively spoken language. That is what makes it so difficult to write. Nowadays, the Ulster-Scots Agency (Tha Boord O' Ulster-Scots) is working to standardize the spelling, but it's still a good ways away.
    Ulster-Scots should be a dead give away, but if not.. they are trying to promote the use of the Ulster-Scots language (Ireland). It may be close to Scots, but I imagine it well be still quite different.

    Frank

  3. #3
    Southern Breeze's Avatar
    Southern Breeze is offline Oops, it seems this member needs to update their email address
    Join Date
    28th August 05
    Location
    Chatsworth Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,867
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've never had trouble reading Pour1Malts posts in spite of never studied the ah, language. Being a prolific reader probably helps.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    17th December 07
    Location
    Staunton, Va
    Posts
    4,948
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    I Respectfully Disagree

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Breeze View Post
    I've never had trouble reading Pour1Malts posts in spite of never studied the ah, language. Being a prolific reader probably helps.
    Well, as both a prolific reader, and writer, and one-time editor, I find Pour1Malts stuff, at times, almost unreadable (Sorry Pour1Malt, and I hope you don't take it too personally). People in Scotland may speak like that, but they are educated in Standard English, the same as "rap artists" (oxymoron) are educated in Standard English, but choose to speak in the patois of the ghetto.

    While it may seem "quaint" to write in accent, it really does little to convey the message.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    14th March 06
    Posts
    1,873
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There are those who would say that Scots is not an accent, but a dialect, and there are those who would say that Scot is neither an accent nor a dialect, but a language.

    And there is, or was, Max Weinreich, who said, "A language is a dialect with an army and a navy."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    14th March 06
    Posts
    1,873
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here is an example of an accent dialect (the set up) and a language (the punch linehttp://www.scotsindependent.org/feat.../scotwit89.htm

    And here is a language, I think. Try listening to it without reading it beforehand and see how much you understand: http://www.scotsindependent.org/feat...t/scotwit1.htm

    and this one: http://www.scotsindependent.org/feat.../scotwit24.htm

  7. #7
    Join Date
    14th March 06
    Posts
    1,873
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Language or dialect?

    This is from the interesting site that Slohairt posted a link to http://www.scots-online.org/grammar/lang.htm

    It's long, but worth it.

    Language or Dialect?
    Popular culture usually thinks of a dialect as a substandard, low status, often rustic form of a language, usually associated with the peasantry, the working class or other parts of the community lacking in prestige. Dialects often being thought of as being some kind of erroneous deviation from the norm - an aberration of the 'proper' or standard form of language.

    The fact is that all speakers of any language are all speakers of at least one dialect - standard English for example is as much an English dialect as is any other form of English. No dialect is in any way linguistically superior to any other.

    Linguistically speaking dialects are usually regarded as dialects of a language, that is, subdivisions of a particular language

    What is a language?

    "A language is a collection of mutually intelligible dialects" - A definition which conveniently characterises a dialect as a subpart of a language, and provides a criterion for distinguishing between one language and another.

    Another criterion for distinguishing languages from dialects is the Ausbausprache - Abstandsprache - Dachsprache framework developed by the linguist Heinz Kloss. Under the terms of that framework Kloss considered Scots to be a Halbsprache (half language). Ausbau referring to a variety having its own standardized form which is used autonomously with respect to other related languages. The Abstand refers to the distance between the languages as regards mutual intelligibility. A Dachsprache is usually a standard language which 'roofs' different dialects in a dialect continuum.

    Take for example, the Scandinavian languages, Norwegian, Swedish and Danish. These are usually assumed to be different languages. Speakers of these three languages can, with little effort, understand and communicate with one another. These languages have little Abstand and are mutually intelligible.
    Take for example German, assumed to be a single language. There are varieties of German which are not understood by speakers of other varieties.

    What does the above prove? One thing for certain - 'language' is not a particularly linguistic notion at all. The reason why Norwegian, Swedish, Danish and German are thought of as single languages has as much to do with political, geographical, historical, sociological and cultural reasons, as with linguistic ones.

    There for the term 'language' is relatively 'unscientific'. Linguists usually refer to 'varieties of language'. There for Norwegian Swedish and Danish could be referred to as varieties of Scandinavian.

    Accents
    Accent refers to a variety which is phonetically or phonologically (pronunciation) different from other varieties.

    Dialects
    A dialects is a variety which is grammatically (and perhaps lexically different) as well as phonologically different from other varieties.

    Dialects and accents frequently merge into each other without any discrete break.

    Geographic Dialect Continua
    A dialect continuum is a chain of mutual intelligibility across geographical space. Adjacent dialects are usually intelligible but dialects which are further apart may not be mutually intelligible.

    An example of such a dialect continuum is the Romance dialect continuum stretching across the Iberian peninsula through France and parts of Belgium down to the southern tip of Italy. From one place to another across this area there would be some linguistic differences distinguishing one place from the another. Some times the differences would be greater some times less, but with distance they would be cumulative. The further apart the places the greater the differences would become. As the distance increases between places communication becomes increasingly more difficult and eventually impossible. In places far apart the 'dialects' spoken are mutually unintelligible, though all across the dialect continuum a chain of mutual intelligibility exists.

    In this example the continuum includes Portuguese, Spanish, Catalan, French and Italian. Where did one language end and the other begin?

    Europe has many other dialect continua. The west Germanic language continuum includes Frisian, Dutch (Flemish), Low Saxon, German and Swiss German. The varieties spoken in Ostend in Belgium and Zürich in Switzerland are not mutually intelligible but are linked by a dialect continuum. Low Saxon is often regarded as a dialect of Dutch in the Netherlands and a dialect of German in Germany. The same 'language' a dialect of two different ones? Low Saxon is in fact a marginalised language not a dialect of either Dutch or German.

    Another dialect continuum is the north Slavic dialect continuum including Czech, Slovak, Polish, Ukrainian and Russian

    As elsewhere in Europe a language continuum exists in the British Isles. Stretching from Cornwall to Shetland. Beat Glauser's research into the Scots / English linguistic border showed that the phonological an lexical borders where almost identical. One of the most marked borders in a European language continuum. This of course has to do with historical and social factors. Before the union of 1707 people in Scotland looked to court Scots as their linguistic standard whereas in England people looked to London. After the Union people in Scotland continued using Scots as an expression of their identity. To a large extent it seems as if English stops at the border and Scots Begins.

    Many Scots who speak English do so with a Scottish accent. Their grammar and lexis is standard English, sometimes with traces of Scots grammar and lexis. This is obviously a dialect of English - usually called Scottish Standard English.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    14th March 06
    Posts
    1,873
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Language or dialect, part 2

    Autonomy and Heteronomy

    Since heteronomy and autonomy are the result of political and cultural rather than purely linguistic factors they are subject to change. For example, until 1650 part of what is now southern Sweden was part of Denmark. The dialects spoken here were then considered to be dialects of Danish. As a result of war and conquest this area became part of Sweden. Forty or fifty years later these dialects were considered dialects of Swedish although no linguistic change had taken place. These dialects had become heteronomous with respect to standard Swedish rather than Danish.

    Until the beginning of the 19th century the official language used in Norway was Danish. It was only with the reemergence of Norway as an independent nation that a distinct, autonomous standard Norwegian was developed - with two orthographies - Bokmċl and Nynorsk.

    It was only in the 1920s that what we now call Afrikaans became an independent language with the acquisition of its own name, orthography and standardised grammar. Before that is was considered a form of Dutch.

    Scots was definitely an autonomous Ausbau variety before 1707 with its own 'standardised' orthography and grammar. At the time no language in Europe was as standardised as they are today. The orthographic variation of the time was no different than in contemporary England. It was the result of English becoming the official language which eventually caused Scots speakers to think of English as the standard or Dachsprache to which their vernacular was heteronomous. Scots did not cease to be spoken in 1707.

    The Scandinavian Languages Norwegian, Swedish and Danish are considered languages because they have distinct, codified, standardised forms, with their own orthographies, grammar books, and literatures; that correspond to three separate nation states.

    Is Scots a dialect or a language?

    Arguments put forward in order to define Scots as a language are:

    Scots has at least five dialect groups and some of these are further subdivided.

    The dialects of Scots are, with their differing pronunciation, grammar, lexis and accents, mutually intelligible to Scots speakers. English speakers often find (broad) Scots dialects unintelligible.

    An extensive literature in Scots reaching back at least 600 years, latterly without a standard written form resulting from the fact that hardly any education takes place through the medium of Scots. Even so Scots grammars have been published over the years so codification or Ausbau isn't completely lacking here.

    Most people consider Scotland to be a nation, and not a peripheral region of Britain/England.

    Scots is also officially recognised.

    From the Scottish Education Department's Scots Language Factsheet (12.08.99) dealing with the Scottish Executive's Policy on the Scots Language:

    "The Scottish Executive considers the Scots language to be an important part of Scotland's distinctive linguistic and cultural heritage..."
    "The UK Government announced on 4 June 1998 its decision to sign the Council of Europe Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. This came into effect as of the 1 July 2001. The Scots language will be covered by Part II of the Charter. By applying Part II of the Charter to Scots the Government will be recognising the distinctive nature and cultural value of the language."

    "The Consultative Steering Group Report (Section 3.3 §§ 53-64 'Language') has recommended that the normal working language of the Parliament should be English but the CSG Report recognised the strong historical and cultural arguments for facilitating the use of Gaelic and Scots in the Parliament"

    "This involves teachers in valuing pupils' spoken language.... This makes children aware of the richness of the language and helps them value the Scots they may use at home or with their peers."

    And the Northern Ireland Good Friday Agreement Approved by referendum on 22 May 1998:


    "Rights, safeguards and equality of opportunity.
    Economic, Social and Cultural Issues

    3. All participants recognise the importance of respect, understanding and tolerance in relation to linguistic diversity, including in Northern Ireland, the Irish language, Ulster-Scots and the languages of the various ethnic communities, all of which are part of the cultural wealth of the island of Ireland."

    And the agreement between the government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the government of Ireland establishing implementation bodies:

    "Annex 2, DEFINITIONS, Part 5, Language
    1.7 "Ullans" is to be understood as the variety of the Scots language traditionally found in parts of Northern Ireland and Donegal. "Ulster-Scots cultural issues" relate to the cultural traditions of the part of the population of Northern Ireland and the border counties which is of Scottish ancestry and the influence of their cultural traditions on others, both within the island of Ireland and in the rest of the world."

    "Annex 1, Part 5, Language

    Ulster Scots

    - promotion of greater awareness and use of Ullans and of Ulster Scots cultural issues, both within Northern Ireland and throughout the island."

    At the end of the day there is no 'scientific' way to prove whether Scots is a language or a dialect. It boils down to a body's personal opinions and prejudices. We could argue about this until the cows come home - or in Scots: Till the kye comes hame.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    25th May 06
    Location
    Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,730
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown View Post
    Well, as both a prolific reader, and writer, and one-time editor, I find Pour1Malts stuff, at times, almost unreadable (Sorry Pour1Malt, and I hope you don't take it too personally). People in Scotland may speak like that, but they are educated in Standard English, the same as "rap artists" (oxymoron) are educated in Standard English, but choose to speak in the patois of the ghetto.

    While it may seem "quaint" to write in accent, it really does little to convey the message.
    Actually his posts are quite simple to read. He takes the effort to use Scots words that have cognates within the English language. If he didn't, you would probably have a great deal of difficulty reading it.

    Scots is not a dialect of English, it is truly a separate language. The definition of 'dialect vs. language' is often one of politics. There is as much difference between Scots and English as there is between Irish and Scottish Gaelic.
    [B][COLOR="DarkGreen"]John Hart[/COLOR]
    Owner/Kiltmaker - Keltoi

  10. #10
    Join Date
    2nd July 06
    Location
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,678
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Highland Logan View Post
    Ulster-Scots should be a dead give away, but if not.. they are trying to promote the use of the Ulster-Scots language (Ireland). It may be close to Scots, but I imagine it well be still quite different.

    Frank
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Scotsdialects.png

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Dirty Scots?
    By Dreadbelly in forum Miscellaneous Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 5th February 07, 04:44 PM
  2. Q's for Youse....
    By The Frumious B. in forum Kilt Board Newbie
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 31st August 06, 12:33 PM
  3. Off topic, but Scots...
    By longshadows in forum Miscellaneous Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 5th April 06, 05:41 AM
  4. About Scots gaelic...
    By CJCarter in forum Miscellaneous Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 5th April 06, 02:08 AM
  5. Any Scots here?!?!?
    By kilt by death in forum Kilt Board Newbie
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 4th April 05, 07:08 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0