Update - pleats are back in the kilt, and I'm almost back to where I was at noon yesterday.
You're fast as a lightning!
I find idea of using the interfacing in the hem as a useful one even in the pleated area (this was my first thinking). As long as the interfacing is soft. It would add a bit of weight to the hem on such light kilt.
I find idea of using the interfacing in the hem as a useful one even in the pleated area (this was my first thinking). As long as the interfacing is soft. It would add a bit of weight to the hem on such light kilt.
Trouble with using it in the pleats is that adding extra fabric makes it really hard to press the pleats without leaving a ridge at the top of the hem because it's so much thicker than the rest of the kilt.
Putting the interfacing into the hem would have worked pretty good without leaving a ridge at all.
I've hemmed a kilt in this tartan so I know first hand how thin this is. You can see the kilt posted in the Heraldry and Tartans forum.
Actually, what I'd really do is use a strip of thin non-fusible interfacing that was 1/2" wider than the hem. I would then pink one edge using my rotary cutter with the pinking blade. Lay the strip inside the hem so that the non-pinked edge was against the fold. With the hem folded up, the interfacing would be sticking out of the hem by 1/2". Then I'd sew the hem as usual through the interfacing, ignoring the interfacing as it were. When you press the hem, you'll not see a ridge at all as the hem and the interfacing are graduated. The pinked edge of the interfacing would not leave a ridge.
There's some very thin interfacing available on the market these days. Just make sure it's a non-fusible!
Last edited by Dixiecat; 19th March 09 at 12:29 PM.
Reason: more info
Originally Posted by Barb T.
Bookmarks