Royal Regiment of Scotland

[M. A. C. Newsome]

People have their own perceptions and preferences, and I have no problem with that. My one and only issue here is for people to avoid such assertions as "anything with less than eight yards is not a real kilt."

I mean, even the nominal "eight yard" kilt often has less than eight yards of cloth. Let alone the historical (and modern revival of) the four yard box pleated kilt.

I'm just trying to correct a misperception about kilt yardage that is fairly common, be it in Scotland, Canada, the United States, or elsewhere.

[Jock Scot]

People have their own perceptions and preferences, and I have no problem with that. My one and only issue here is for people to avoid such assertions as "anything with less than eight yards is not a real kilt."

I mean, even the nominal "eight yard" kilt often has less than eight yards of cloth. Let alone the historical (and modern revival of) the four yard box pleated kilt.

I'm just trying to correct a misperception about kilt yardage that is fairly common, be it in Scotland, Canada, the United States, or elsewhere.

The thing is Matt and I respecfully point this out again.There are 5 million or so Scots and umpteen million other people in the world that have a perception of what a real kilt is. They have never heard of boxpleats, you, me, or Xmarks and they are never likely to.Their loss maybe, but that is the way it is.

[gasbag]

There is eight yards of wool cloth in a kilt as well as knife pleats? Well I'll be
Just a thought from a "new to kilts" type like myself, when i ordered my kilt, i had no idea there was different weights, yardages or styles of pleating.
I came here and i continue to learn. Thank you all for contributing and expanding my knowledge base.
At the end of the day, i just love the kilt for what it is to me, a link to my family history.
My two cents

[M. A. C. Newsome]

The thing is Matt and I respecfully point this out again.There are 5 million or so Scots and umpteen million other people in the world that have a perception of what a real kilt is. They have never heard of boxpleats, you, me, or Xmarks and they are never likely to.Their loss maybe, but that is the way it is.

Jock,

I think you are misreading me. I'm not disagreeing with you. I understand and agree that the vast majority of people think of the kilt as a very regulated garment that must be a certain way -- and one of those "requirements" is that it be made from eight yards of cloth.

Regardless of common opinion, however, the amount of material in a kilt is not now and has never been historically a requirement for being an authentic kilt. Is a misconception -- a popularly held one, I'll admit, but a misconception nonetheless.

It is my job (literally) to educate people about the history and traditions of the kilt, and one aspect of that is to dispell the myth that a "real" kilt must have exactly eight yards of cloth.

[Jock Scot]

Jock,

I think you are misreading me. I'm not disagreeing with you. I understand and agree that the vast majority of people think of the kilt as a very regulated garment that must be a certain way -- and one of those "requirements" is that it be made from eight yards of cloth.

Regardless of common opinion, however, the amount of material in a kilt is not now and has never been historically a requirement for being an authentic kilt. Is a misconception -- a popularly held one, I'll admit, but a misconception nonetheless.

It is my job (literally) to educate people about the history and traditions of the kilt, and one aspect of that is to dispell the myth that a "real" kilt must have exactly eight yards of cloth.

Matt ,I understand full well that you are not disagreeing with me.I feel that you are missing my point though. What I am trying, unsuccessfully it seems, to point out, is that you should not be surprised, or hurt, that the misconception continues, as most of the people who are even mildly interested in the kilt have a perception of what a real kilt is. You and others know that that perception is not necessarily correct,sadly that message is not getting through, in spite of your best endeavours. And I cannot see it ever will.

What I am saying(nicely I hope) is that you should not be surprised when a person of the majority, ill informed if you like, group has no idea what you are talking about! Of course if you,me, others who know better, xmarks, etc, could reach out and educate them, then all to the good. Sadly I don't think that will ever happen, so the 8 yard, tartan, wool, knife pleated, real kilt perception will live on. I am afraid you will still have to grind your teeth with frustration when people talk of "real" kilts for a very long time yet!

[Phil]

When I went to my tailor to have a "real" kilt made, the only choice I was offered was in the tartan to be used. Apart from that there was no question that it would be knife pleated to the sett and that was what was delivered. I fully understand that others regard a box-pleated kilt as perfectly acceptable and even a low-cost alternative. As Jock has tried to put across, somewhat unsuccessfully it seems, the only style of kilt considered as authentic by any Scotsman is a tartan, knife-pleated kilt, predominately pleated to the sett with a few pleated to the line, although these would be regarded as a military style rather than a civilian one (i.e. the wearer got a cheapie from the military surplus store!). I imagine the actual yardage would vary depending upon the size of the sett and the wearer's waist size but a good indication of a quality kilt would be the depth of the pleats - 4 inches almost or the length of your fingers. Anything less is nothing more than a tartan skirt.

[Tartan Hiker]

(snip)...the only style of kilt considered as authentic by any Scotsman is a tartan, knife-pleated kilt, predominately pleated to the sett with a few pleated to the line...

If my memory serves correctly, pleating to the sett was first documented in 1902 and described at that time as a novel new way to pleat a kilt. That means that there very well may be a few Scots still living that were born before knife pleats to the sett had even been invented.

[Phil]

If my memory serves correctly, pleating to the sett was first documented in 1902 and described at that time as a novel new way to pleat a kilt. That means that there very well may be a few Scots still living that were born before knife pleats to the sett had even been invented.

I seriously doubt that there are any 107 year-old Scots still around. There are, however, a number here who can trace their kilt-wearing traditions back to the early 1950's and to dismiss this in such a way is nothing but an impertinence. Modern re-inventions of our national dress should take account of the culture that actually originated it without trying to re-invent the tradition and culture behind it. There are many differing opinions expressed on this site quoting innumerable "learned" sources. The fact remains, however, that there is probably no-one here other than the native Scots that has worn a kilt prior to 10-20 years ago. Quoting spurious historical "facts" to justify modifying these traditions to suit ones own point of view is easy to do but to try and infer that they have any relevance to a traditional form of Scottish dress is nothing short of re-writing a culture of which you really have no genuine experience or knowledge to suit the circumstances you wish to present.

[macwilkin]

Matt ,I understand full well that you are not disagreeing with me.I feel that you are missing my point though. What I am trying, unsuccessfully it seems, to point out, is that you should not be surprised, or hurt, that the misconception continues, as most of the people who are even mildly interested in the kilt have a perception of what a real kilt is. You and others know that that perception is not necessarily correct,sadly that message is not getting through, in spite of your best endeavours. And I cannot see it ever will.

What I am saying(nicely I hope) is that you should not be surprised when a person of the majority, ill informed if you like, group has no idea what you are talking about! Of course if you,me, others who know better, xmarks, etc, could reach out and educate them, then all to the good. Sadly I don't think that will ever happen, so the 8 yard, tartan, wool, knife pleated, real kilt perception will live on. I am afraid you will still have to grind your teeth with frustration when people talk of "real" kilts for a very long time yet!

Welcome to the world of a history teacher, Jock.

Of course, many of us in the field have a belief that if we can reach just one student, then we've done our jobs...I deal with myths about history on a daily basis. I may not change some of my student's minds -- all I can do is present with them the facts, and provide the most accurate and objective account of the subject at hand -- and I've done my job. What they do with them is their business, I suppose. You can lead a person to knowledge -- but you can't make them think! :mrgreen:

T.

[Jock Scot]

Welcome to the world of a history teacher, Jock.

Of course, many of us in the field have a belief that if we can reach just one student, then we've done our jobs...I deal with myths about history on a daily basis. I may not change some of my student's minds -- all I can do is present with them the facts, and provide the most accurate and objective account of the subject at hand -- and I've done my job. What they do with them is their business, I suppose. You can lead a person to knowledge -- but you can't make them think! :mrgreen:

T.

I really don't think I have the skill, or the patience to be a teacher!