-
14th November 09, 05:55 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by Rex_Tremende
Well, he understood that Lord Lyon did that. We were discussing the design of a personal tartan, which he desired to restrict the production of without permission. He claimed the process by which one did this was to go through Lord Lyon, and that's what he had learned from the internet. I'm trying to locate examples of where this might have been stated to be the case, because I haven't come up with any to substantiate such a claim. I can find reason for someone to be confused about it, though, and to confuse one with the other. For instance, the name of this sub-forum is "Tartans and Heraldry." They do seem like related topics and one might draw conclusions. But misinformation is another matter. I'm trying to locate possible sources of it.
Regards,
Rex.
I have long advocated that this sub-forum should be split into two separate forums. There might be some heraldry attached to a particular tartan and there might be a tartan associated with a particular coat of arms, but it is all 'if, but and maybe'.
We might as well have kilt pins and fly plaids in one forum. In the end it would be realised that a kilt pin is not a brooch and a fly plaid is not a kilt and like tartans and heraldry, have nothing in common.
Regards
Chas
-
-
14th November 09, 12:58 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by Chas
I have long advocated that this sub-forum should be split into two separate forums. There might be some heraldry attached to a particular tartan and there might be a tartan associated with a particular coat of arms, but it is all 'if, but and maybe'.
We might as well have kilt pins and fly plaids in one forum. In the end it would be realised that a kilt pin is not a brooch and a fly plaid is not a kilt and like tartans and heraldry, have nothing in common.
Regards
Chas
I'm not so sure I agree, Chas. Both tartans and heraldry can be symbols of a certain clan -- in fact, I would daresay that more people are apt to recognise the tartan of a clan over its badge, which of course is the crest of the clan chief in a buckle & strap. So I don't think we can make such a ironclad pronouncement that they have nothing in common, when in fact both tartans and heraldry (in the form of the clansman's badge) have come to symbolize the wearer's belonging to a certain clan.
Also, back in 2005, when this particular forum was created, we simply did not have the many students of heraldry as members that we do now. Given that the primary purpose of this forum is related to Highland attire, especially kilts, the connection between clan heraldry and tartans was made. You are free to disagree with that decision of course.
T.
-
-
14th November 09, 04:44 PM
#3
I do not wish to hijack the thread any further, Todd, but I do disagree.
Regards
Chas
-
-
14th November 09, 08:33 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by Chas
I do not wish to hijack the thread any further, Todd, but I do disagree.
Regards
Chas
Then respectfully, Chas -- why don't you submit as a suggestion to Steve and the Mods? I honestly don't have, as they in the Ozarks, "a dog in the hunt" here. I see your point -- all I was offering was an explanation as to why the forum was originally set up the way it was -- I don't believe you were a member then, so hence my reasons for explaining.
Todd
-
Similar Threads
-
By jrmiller in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 19
Last Post: 19th July 09, 08:16 PM
-
By The Wizard of BC in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 2
Last Post: 3rd July 07, 06:16 PM
-
By MacWage in forum The Tartan Place
Replies: 4
Last Post: 17th June 06, 07:24 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks