|
-
27th March 10, 09:46 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by skauwt
yup Alex is spot on my ancestors where "The Chisholm's of that ilk "from the borders and none of them where chiefs just some lairds and craftmen so "of that ilk" isn't tied to down to chiefship
Ah but it is tied to chiefship, as you put it. Please see my previous post. Chisholm of Chisholm may be interpretted as "Chisholm of that Ilk."
-
-
27th March 10, 01:08 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by JSFMACLJR
Ah but it is tied to chiefship, as you put it. Please see my previous post. Chisholm of Chisholm may be interpretted as "Chisholm of that Ilk."
so your telling me my ancestor was a chief in the 1550s at the borders? ive traced my tree back to just after the 1520s and the of that ilk is stop being used by about 1600
-
-
27th March 10, 02:21 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by The Scotsman
Yes, if your ancestor went by the designation "of that Ilk" then he was the head of the Name & would have borne the undifferenced ancestral arms that were originally borne by the progenitor of the Chisholm clan.
thanks for the input ,i should really get my backside down to the hawick heritage hub the Chisholm society genealogist reckons they have a good amount documents regarding my ancestry ive been meaning to get down and research more indepth as pre 1620 its a bit murky with regards to there titles and land
the book surnames and clansman by micheal robson has a fair few bits in it regarding my ancestry it seems they had a interesting life down there and plenty border based mischief with the local law at the time
-
-
28th March 10, 10:09 AM
#4
Favored By Frauds
 Originally Posted by The Scotsman
Yes, if your ancestor went by the designation "of that Ilk" then he was the head of the Name & would have borne the undifferenced ancestral arms that were originally borne by the progenitor of the Chisholm clan.
Quite right.
Unfortunately in recent times "of that Ilk" has become the favored post-nominal suffix of any number of would-be tricksters, mountebanks, and frauds. Perhaps the most recent of these two-bit identity thieves to come under the glare of public exposure was the fellow masquerading as "Aiken of that Ilk"-- who went to incredible lengths to bamboozle the slack-jawed mouth breathers clinging to his kilt. His most outrageous bit of genealogical larceny involved forging a tombstone! Caught in the act by the police, Mr. Aiken has not been heard of recently. But undoubtedly, like all con-men, he'll be back as soon as he thinks the heat's off.
-
-
28th March 10, 10:12 AM
#5
But he has raised his ugly head again, Scott, in the disguise of "The Scotsman." The big give-away was the post he made of his goat hair sporran, with the assumed crest of two birds of some sort.
Busted!
-
-
28th March 10, 10:19 AM
#6
A suggested motto...
Perhaps Mr. Aiken (known colloquially as "Aiken that Oik") should consider as his motto:
TRUTH WILL OUT
Just a thought...
-
-
28th March 10, 10:27 AM
#7
Crest-fallen
 Originally Posted by JSFMACLJR
But he has raised his ugly head again, Scott, in the disguise of "The Scotsman." The big give-away was the post he made of his goat hair sporran, with the assumed crest of two birds of some sort.
Busted!
Sandy, in heraldic terms those are known as "birds of a feather" and originated with the Sobiesky-Stuarts, and have been passed down through a long line of fakes and frauds to the present individual who has adopted them "by his own hand" (or should that be purloined??), Lyon refusing to entertain his claims-- forged tombstone or not.
-
-
28th March 10, 06:29 PM
#8
Truth Will Out
 Originally Posted by JSFMACLJR
But he has raised his ugly head again, Scott, in the disguise of "The Scotsman." The big give-away was the post he made of his goat hair sporran, with the assumed crest of two birds of some sort.
Busted!
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Sandy, in heraldic terms those are known as "birds of a feather" and originated with the Sobiesky-Stuarts, and have been passed down through a long line of fakes and frauds to the present individual who has adopted them "by his own hand" (or should that be purloined??), Lyon refusing to entertain his claims-- forged tombstone or not.
And here I was starting to suspect that Tartanraven had returned under a different guise. 
I must say, personally, it is such a pleasure to be in the company of gentlemen such as yourselves
Last edited by BoldHighlander; 28th March 10 at 07:02 PM.
[SIZE="2"][FONT="Georgia"][COLOR="DarkGreen"][B][I]T. E. ("TERRY") HOLMES[/I][/B][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE="1"][FONT="Georgia"][COLOR="DarkGreen"][B][I]proud descendant of the McReynolds/MacRanalds of Ulster & Keppoch, Somerled & Robert the Bruce.[/SIZE]
[SIZE="1"]"Ah, here comes the Bold Highlander. No @rse in his breeks but too proud to tug his forelock..." Rob Roy (1995)[/I][/B][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]
-
-
29th March 10, 06:49 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by JSFMACLJR
But he has raised his ugly head again, Scott, in the disguise of "The Scotsman." The big give-away was the post he made of his goat hair sporran, with the assumed crest of two birds of some sort.
Busted!
The references to assumed arms, neo-pagan spirituality, and xenophobia all add up.
At least the motto surrounding his crest is reflective of his presence on this board...

Cordially,
David
-
Similar Threads
-
By Phogfan86 in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 6
Last Post: 6th April 09, 09:56 AM
-
By Hamish in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 27
Last Post: 24th February 09, 07:27 PM
-
By Cayusedriver in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 3
Last Post: 22nd August 08, 11:14 AM
-
By S.G. in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 17
Last Post: 30th July 08, 03:21 PM
-
By gilmore in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 11
Last Post: 15th February 08, 11:52 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks