-
26th July 10, 09:42 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by Cygnus
...
Also my sentiment - I don't take any "family stories" as gospel, simply because the tendency for most people is to "exaggerate" the truth to improve the family's historical standing. After a few generations of such exaggeration, one quickly becomes the long-lost heir to the throne rather than the descendant of a weaver or swineherd!
It's true that family stores often get mangled over the years, but sometimes they can have a grain of truth that verifies more reliable research, and they can also be helpful in pointing you in the right direction.
There is an example in the Gilmores. One of my relatives in the 1930's wrote down a family history based solely on what she had been told over the years. She started with a mangled version of the story of the first of the Gilmore/Morrisons being shipwrecked and clinging to driftwood, etc, as is told in the clan histories. She got the location wrong, as well as several other bits of information, but the fact that the story had been passed down for some 200 years since they/we came to America lent it its own kind of credibility.
-
-
26th July 10, 12:56 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by gilmore
It's true that family stores often get mangled over the years, but sometimes they can have a grain of truth that verifies more reliable research, and they can also be helpful in pointing you in the right direction.
There is an example in the Gilmores. One of my relatives in the 1930's wrote down a family history based solely on what she had been told over the years. She started with a mangled version of the story of the first of the Gilmore/Morrisons being shipwrecked and clinging to driftwood, etc, as is told in the clan histories. She got the location wrong, as well as several other bits of information, but the fact that the story had been passed down for some 200 years since they/we came to America lent it its own kind of credibility.
I'm aware of an intentional brick wall in one line of my family a few generations back. What ever happened, they ain't going to tell.
The other side had it all mixed up and it turns out, they are Irish and English, along with a bunch of other things, but I have found no proof of Scottish ancestors. Just playing the surname game, I could have claimed to be of Gordon or MacMillan, or several other clans, but it's all English or Irish, or misspellings.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
-
26th July 10, 01:40 PM
#3
Because we live in a computer age, with on-line spell-checkers, it is easy to forget that only two generations ago spelling was an adventure and not a science.
Dictionaries were only introduced into the majority of UK schools in about 1910. It is said that for many British men, the first time that they saw their own name in print was when they signed up for war in 1914.
For those who could read and write their own name, it was mainly not them who were writing it. Civil servants, Parish, Town, Army, Military clerks, Census takers all did the writing themselves - and spelled things as they understood them.
Finally, on my mother's side of the family the name is Jackson. Two generations before her, were two brothers who lived in properties side by side. One was a Jackman and the other was a Johnstone. The father of both was a Jackson.
Spelling is interesting, but should never be taken as Gospel.
Regards
Chas
-
-
26th July 10, 02:31 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by Chas
Because we live in a computer age, with on-line spell-checkers, it is easy to forget that only two generations ago spelling was an adventure and not a science.
Dictionaries were only introduced into the majority of UK schools in about 1910. It is said that for many British men, the first time that they saw their own name in print was when they signed up for war in 1914.
For those who could read and write their own name, it was mainly not them who were writing it. Civil servants, Parish, Town, Army, Military clerks, Census takers all did the writing themselves - and spelled things as they understood them.
Finally, on my mother's side of the family the name is Jackson. Two generations before her, were two brothers who lived in properties side by side. One was a Jackman and the other was a Johnstone. The father of both was a Jackson.
Spelling is interesting, but should never be taken as Gospel.
Regards
Chas
Plus there is the whole word Meme evolution going on as the cultures and ruling class change. I guess sometimes the only way to settle it is to draw blood... and have it DNA tested.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
Similar Threads
-
By Expat2011 in forum USA Kilts
Replies: 18
Last Post: 1st June 09, 07:19 AM
-
By Haunt in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 15
Last Post: 8th October 08, 05:33 PM
-
By Sionnach in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 10
Last Post: 12th September 08, 08:01 AM
-
By cavscout in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 0
Last Post: 11th January 06, 06:10 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks