White Hose

[tripleblessed]

I am not talking "quasi-crypto-history" from Discovery TV, any more than I am referring to Hollywood movies, which assertion has been made before by the same poster. I really don't like to get personal unless it's a positive comment,
but I see that some don't seem to be able to discuss as gentlemanly adults.
I might suggest getting out more, and talking to researchers if one has any
interest in knowledge as opposed to what's thought by the armchair observer
to be likely to have happened then because this expert said so without going to
look.

I have no wish to be put back on ignore by everyone, but I do my best to be positive and supportive of the knowledge and accomplishments of all on the forum. It gets old being slammed in return just because I have sought out interesting and unusual areas of study. The people who know me best find me to be reasonably well informed and accurate. If you don't like
something I post, don't agree, but NEVER assume I don't have a solid basis for my statement.

And I agree that accuracy is important, and that in formal reenacting, standard is better, but real life has rarely been standard.