|
-
18th August 10, 08:30 AM
#1
Interesting point made there by Jock.
But I must congratulate you, Jeff, on a balanced and courteous response to the club secretary that underlines his hypocrisy without calling a spade a bloody shovel.
I don’t play golf, but I support the right of kilted men to play the game, especially since it is a Scottish sport.
Women golfers are nowadays permitted a choice between trousers and a skirt. What is different about men?
Regards,
Mike
The fear of the Lord is a fountain of life.
[Proverbs 14:27]
-
-
18th August 10, 09:48 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by Mike_Oettle
What is different about men?
Regards,
Mike
Women's legs are nicer to look at?
-
-
18th August 10, 07:45 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
Being mischievous of mind and with absolutely no knowledge of golfing rules. Would plus 4's (traditional golfing attire I believe) worn on a golf course(Royal Troon for example),by a male,but without hose, be regarded as "long trousers" or, a variation of those "long short things" that are seen about these days?One could argue that they are shorter long trousers,I suppose?
Get stuck in Jeff!!!!
Jock
To the best of my knowledge, Plus-2's, Plus-4's, and Kinickers, when worn with proper length hose (those covering the legs below the hem of the trousers, are appropriate for wear (they must be since I saw two golfers teeing off Troon #1 wearing canary yellow and fluorescent pink knickers with matching argyle hose and vests as I was coming down Troon #18 in my trousers. I believe that if they were worn without hose or with shorter hose than covered the exposed lower leg beneath the hem that they would likely be considered inappropriate (as well s funny looking), as best as I can assume they would then be considered "shorts". But then again I can only speculate what Troon's decision might be.
j
-
-
19th August 10, 03:07 PM
#4
Artificer wrote (in response to my question): “Women's legs are nicer to look at? ”
Well, men (myself included) enjoy looking at women’s legs, but women also like looking at men’s legs (as testified by several of our female members at X Marks).
Modern-day fashion requires women to remove the hair from their legs (thank heaven we males don’t have to), but it actually doesn’t do much for them.
There are few things uglier than a woman’s leg with stubble, and it doesn’t feel great either.
Most women’s legs are just as eye-catching with a little bit of natural fuzz than hairless, especially if the hair is blonde or red.
Regards,
Mike
PS: Okay, you were in jest and I haven’t responded that way. But this is a point that irks. I hate seeing advertisements for women’s razors, or for hair removal by electrolysis.
The fear of the Lord is a fountain of life.
[Proverbs 14:27]
-
-
19th August 10, 03:42 PM
#5
Ok, I like this turn of topic!
-
-
18th August 10, 10:40 AM
#6
 Originally Posted by ForresterModern
This morning in my email I received the following response from the club secretary at Royal Troon regarding my previous email complaint:
Dear Dr Foster
Thank you for your e-mail regarding your visit to Royal Troon. I regret that you felt aggrieved by being asked to change from your kilt into trousers to play golf. Royal Troon wants guests to have an enjoyable experience when they visit us and indeed we have a large volume of correspondence thanking us for our hospitality.
In keeping with many organisations in golf, including most amateur and professional organisations who stage major championships around the world, long trousers are the accepted form of dress on the golf course. Royal Troon adopts a similar approach.
We greatly respect, however, the traditional dress of Scotland and welcome full ceremonial kilt attire being worn within the Clubhouse.
I hope that you will reconsider your view and visit Troon in the future.
Regards
David
D L K Brown
Secretary
Royal Troon Golf Club
Troon
Ayrshire
KA10 6EP
Tel No: 01292 311555
Fax No: 01292 318204
I'm sorry you didn't get the response you were seeking. I can't say I'm surprised, though.

Jock's point about it being a course in the Lowlands, with no authentic ties to the kilt, is well-taken.
Perhaps this incident does serve to provide us with useful data about how/when Scots think it is proper to wear THCD (in the Lowlands of Scotland, at least.)
A friendly question for the Scots, and particularly Highlanders, on XMarks- Have you ever worn your kilt while golfing?
David
-
-
18th August 10, 12:04 PM
#7
Coz Forrester,
My moral umbrage continues to revolve around the fact that they sprang the no-kilts thing on you, a fellow clansman, without warning. Were you acting in bad faith to offend or make mockery of the club or its rules? Were you actually in unconscious violation of a rule? Of course not, and as their guest they owed you the benefit of the doubt. The letter to you has pretended that the no-kilts rule was there all along, or that it is so well known as to be understood, but both the rules as seen and your experience at other Scots courses show that their pretense is piffle. Myself I might decide to extend the 'piffle' status to the whole club and write them off in my book of those that count- but of course if you want to battle for the kilt to be specifically allowed, go to and good luck!
-
-
18th August 10, 02:23 PM
#8
The secretary has clearly not addressed the fact that kilts being exluded when playing golf is not in the rules as they appear on their web page.
It is ignorant also of how other courses have no problem with the kilt and thus what he claims is far from standard practice.
An unsatisfactory and inconplete reply to your concerns.
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
-
18th August 10, 09:56 AM
#9
Jeff.
A small, but possibly important point that you might bear in mind, is that Troon is most certainly in Scotland, but not in the Highlands the home of the kilt, which may colour the club's point of view.
-
-
19th August 10, 06:01 AM
#10
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
Jeff.
A small, but possibly important point that you might bear in mind, is that Troon is most certainly in Scotland, but not in the Highlands the home of the kilt, which may colour the club's point of view.
I understand your point, Jock, but then that does not explain the positive reaction at Turnberry (even further south than Troon) or Muirfield (still lowlanders and with a more snooty reputation than Troon as far as guests are concerned) who opened their doors without issue, and to some degree with pleasure and pride to have a kilted golfer on their courses. Carnoustie and the two St Andrews courses are more Highland (Fife) but still not in the heart of the true central or north highlands either, but being publicly owned courses it is understandable that their dress codes might be a wee bit less restrictive. But the Dukes is privately owned as is Kingsbarns, and neither of them are any further North than St Andrews, so really not classically in the Highlands either, with dress codes that did not seem to exclude the kilt as appropriate attire for a round there.
But thanks for the thoughts.
jeff
-
Similar Threads
-
By joshuawray1 in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 5
Last Post: 28th May 10, 05:56 PM
-
By Minnow in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 33
Last Post: 26th February 09, 11:18 AM
-
By Moosedog in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 0
Last Post: 30th January 08, 10:47 AM
-
By David Thornton in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 16
Last Post: 28th May 06, 01:30 PM
-
By Yaish in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 20
Last Post: 3rd January 06, 05:37 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks