|
-
2nd November 16, 11:12 AM
#171
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
Precisely. At least we can agree on that. 
Wonderful! Now, a quick look at the original poster's profile tells me he is an American residing in North Carolina, so I think it quite clear that his use of the term was in the American sense. Hopefully this dispels the confusion!
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Wareyin For This Useful Post:
-
2nd November 16, 11:23 AM
#172
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to neloon For This Useful Post:
-
2nd November 16, 11:24 AM
#173
 Originally Posted by Wareyin
Wonderful! Now, a quick look at the original poster's profile tells me he is an American residing in North Carolina, so I think it quite clear that his use of the term was in the American sense. Hopefully this dispels the confusion!
Not one bit I fear. In my book he is an American.
Last edited by Jock Scot; 2nd November 16 at 11:30 AM.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
-
2nd November 16, 11:36 AM
#174
 Originally Posted by Reiver
Earlier there was a reference to Lord Lyon and his comments about the Diaspora and Scots abroad (his words, not mine) and Alan maintains that the lineage aspect associated with that kind of position is anathema to most Scots.
Yet the majority of Scots voted for the status quo and all that it entails...voluntarily decided to be subjects of the Crown.
I don't see that you have a valid argument there.
You have missed the point of the argument
Alan stated Scotland had been a single entity since 843
It has NOT due to the dates shown, if part was not annexed to the crown in those days it was not part of Scotland, the crown was Scotland .
Note also the crown was King of the Scots, not the Gaels, not the Shetlands. Even today there are Shetlanders and Gael who will quite vehemently state they are not Scots
"We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give"
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill
-
-
2nd November 16, 11:42 AM
#175
-
-
2nd November 16, 11:43 AM
#176
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
Not one bit I fear. In my book he is an American.
Yes, he is "an American." He is not "a Scot", nor did he ask if he was. He asked if he was "Scottish", by which Americans mean "of Scottish ancestry".
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Wareyin For This Useful Post:
-
2nd November 16, 11:45 AM
#177
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
Not one bit I fear. In my book he is an American.
...of Scottish ancestry!
Does that terminology/clarification help things for all?
-
-
2nd November 16, 11:48 AM
#178
 Originally Posted by The Q
You have missed the point of the argument
Alan stated Scotland had been a single entity since 843
It has NOT due to the dates shown, if part was not annexed to the crown in those days it was not part of Scotland, the crown was Scotland .
Note also the crown was King of the Scots, not the Gaels, not the Shetlands. Even today there are Shetlanders and Gael who will quite vehemently state they are not Scots
Well, whomever they are they take great pains to export 'Scotishness' thru varied and sundry economic enterprises supported by Govt. travel and economic departments....and have so for numerous decades.
They've specifically targeted the diaspora in this endeavor to no end.....and do so thru the internet, magazines, TV programs and all/any other means available.
Then some folks accuse us of attempting to steal the Haggis off their own very private plates.
That's a bit of inconsistency to aye?
So, when you do finally control your own Govt., as Alan says you are moving towards, I expect to see all of this exporting kilts/Clan goods and services to come to a screeching halt as most Scots find it to be thievery, or so we are told.
If you do so I'll support your position totally......if not, you are speaking out of both sides of your mouth.
De Oppresso Liber
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Reiver For This Useful Post:
-
2nd November 16, 11:52 AM
#179
 Originally Posted by davidlpope
The only thing it means is that one is legally a citizen. Nothing else. 
Of where? 
Alan
-
-
2nd November 16, 11:54 AM
#180
 Originally Posted by neloon
Of where?
Alan
The United States of America.
Last edited by davidlpope; 2nd November 16 at 12:08 PM.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks