-
12th March 14, 08:12 PM
#1
And again, with the Gold Brothers...
The Gold Brothers just today bought out ANOTHER property on the Royal Mile... http://www.scotsman.com/news/scotlan...deal-1-1228479
KEN CORMACK
Clan Buchanan
U.S. Coast Guard, Retired
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
-
-
12th March 14, 08:24 PM
#2
Capitalism is a wonderful thing, but sometimes you want to just smack the crap out of the invisible hand.
Allen Sinclair, FSAScot
Eastern Region Vice President
North Carolina Commissioner
Clan Sinclair Association (USA)
-
The Following 4 Users say 'Aye' to ASinclair For This Useful Post:
-
12th March 14, 08:29 PM
#3
I consider this not so newsworthy as it appears from the article that the locals feel it an insult. My condolences to the other local "quality" businesses dealing with the "Kilt" and proper, respectful Scottish attire.
Hawk
Shawnee / Anishinabe and Clan Colquhoun
-
-
12th March 14, 10:19 PM
#4
Capitalism is one thing, but this just seems to me that the city council is ill prepared to deal with these kinds of issues, and have not developed a good plan or strategy for the future.
Many cities have bylaws that restrict the number of businesses of a certain type that can go into a particular area for precisely this reason. It's hard to be angry at the Gold Bros. any more than it's hard to be hard to be angry at a cat for hunting birds. It's up to the city planners and elected officials to decide whether they want the Royal Mile to be one long strip of souvenir shops or not. Ball's in their court.
-
The Following 10 Users say 'Aye' to CDNSushi For This Useful Post:
-
13th March 14, 02:26 AM
#5
I thought that commercial properties had to apply for change of use planning consent, if the council has given this for yet anther tartan tat establishment they simply prove once again that as long as they get their business rates income they do not care two hoots about the Royal Mile.
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
-
13th March 14, 04:04 AM
#6
As a local resident I can't remember the last time I ventured onto the Royal Mile. It really is just a destination for tourists as there is nothing there for locals. I crossed it on Saturday on the way to the museum and it was mobbed with French people passing the time until the rugby started. Never seen so many men wearing berets dressed in what looked like ladies' tartan skirts! Fortunately there were a few genuine looking kilts about in other parts of town.
I wouldn't get yourself too uptight about the Royal Mile as it is rapidly becoming just another theme park. It wouldn't surprise me if Disney put in a bid for it!
-
The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to Phil For This Useful Post:
-
13th March 14, 06:07 AM
#7
 Originally Posted by McClef
I thought that commercial properties had to apply for change of use planning consent, if the council has given this for yet anther tartan tat establishment they simply prove once again that as long as they get their business rates income they do not care two hoots about the Royal Mile.
Sounds like what's going on here in Chicago….and every other city where they're hungry for money. I suppose that the best reaction to this is for all of us to resolve to buy our own stuff only from reputable kilt suppliers and to try to do an outreach to inform the….uh…un-informed as to the difference between tartan tat and the genuine article. For some that doesn't matter but most right thinking people will see the point. A couple of friends of mine were in Edinburgh a few months ago and were resolved to get the husband a kilt…they balked because they didn't realize the expense involved in purchasing a REAL one BUT, to their credit, they didn't bother buying a bad replica from some roadside stand.
Best
AA
ANOTHER KILTED LEBOWSKI AND...HEY, CAREFUL, MAN, THERE'S A BEVERAGE HERE!
-
-
13th March 14, 06:56 AM
#8
 Originally Posted by McClef
I thought that commercial properties had to apply for change of use planning consent, if the council has given this for yet anther tartan tat establishment they simply prove once again that as long as they get their business rates income they do not care two hoots about the Royal Mile.
I'm not defending the Gold Bros in any way, but I'm curious as to what the city council could possibly do about it? What would it look like if they did "care two hoots about the Royal Mile"? Would it involve shutting down an obviously profitable business, or artificially propping up businesses that aren't doing so well?
There's one single reason that the Gold Brothers are successful: they sell stuff that people want to buy. We purists may not like that business model, since it has a lot of other ramifications on the industry and traditions, but those cannot really be considered legal reasons to thwart a successful (and legal) enterprise. The Gold Bros are bringing money into the city's coffers and bringing tourists to the area which will spend money elsewhere as well (especially if they've saved money on their tartan tat purchases). If this business model were run by anyone other than the Gold Brothers (like, perhaps, a more traditional Scottish family), I would imagine that most folks would be congratulating them and saying it's good for everyone.
-
The Following 4 Users say 'Aye' to Tobus For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks