-
1st August 15, 12:50 PM
#1
Flashes .. Single/Double ?
With knitted/loomed, after they are tied one is left with two ends to arrange nicely to show under the hose turn down. The flashes made on elastic or other have two sets to hang under the hose turn down. I've begun sewing up my own 'ribbons on elastic' to build up the collection. The other day I made a grey set with only a single and thought it looked rather good. Should the hose flashes be double?
-
-
1st August 15, 02:04 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by Taskr
With knitted/loomed, after they are tied one is left with two ends to arrange nicely to show under the hose turn down. The flashes made on elastic or other have two sets to hang under the hose turn down. I've begun sewing up my own 'ribbons on elastic' to build up the collection. The other day I made a grey set with only a single and thought it looked rather good. Should the hose flashes be double?
My opinion (from a traditional point of view) is, if flashes are meant to simulate the two loose ends of a hose tie, then yes, there should be two. Obviously, you may do what you will.
Allen Sinclair, FSA Scot
Eastern Region Vice President
North Carolina Commissioner
Clan Sinclair Association (USA)
-
The Following 5 Users say 'Aye' to ASinclair For This Useful Post:
-
1st August 15, 02:54 PM
#3
FWIW, I prefer to flip flashes back up and over so only a small portion is showing. I think the longer length showing is rather dorky, but that's IMHO.
-
The Following 5 Users say 'Aye' to Mael Coluim For This Useful Post:
-
2nd August 15, 04:48 AM
#4
I don't use flashes with the elastic band, but nevertheless, I arrange the ties such that very little are exposed. I like them to keep my hose up. Beyond that, just a splash of colour is nice. But not too much.
That being the case, a single bit exposed would probably go largely unnoticed. I don't think it matters either way. If you like the look, then I say go for it.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Spartan Tartan For This Useful Post:
-
2nd August 15, 07:54 AM
#5
Yes since flashes are the vestige of a bow, one would see two ends, and perhaps also two loops.
Here in 1852 flashes had got quite huge and showy in the army

With the new uniform introduced in 1855 the flashes got dialed back considerably, and were worn under the turnover cuffs, not over the cuff as previously (the Pipe Major looks like he's having a bad day)

Modern military flashes are doubled, either with loops or without, but these Seaforth Highlanders ones appear to be single

For sure the pipers of The Queens Own Highlanders, then The Highlanders, wore interesting wide single flashes made from thick striped material that reminds me of Guatemalan work

Here are the military single flashes, on the left the Queens Own Highlanders pipers', on the right the Scots Guards pipers'
Last edited by OC Richard; 2nd August 15 at 08:43 AM.
Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte
-
The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to OC Richard For This Useful Post:
-
2nd August 15, 07:59 AM
#6
Ah nice, the big ones look great with the spats.
-
-
4th January 16, 05:09 AM
#7
What an array of tartans due to amalgamation! Cameron of Erracht kilts and plaids (Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders), Gordon pipe bags (Gordon Highlanders) and Mackenzie ribbons (Seaforth Highlanders ).
The Kilt is my delight !
-
-
4th January 16, 05:22 AM
#8
Nice to see that the hose tops are not worn too near the bottom of the knee in OCR's pictures . Hose worn too high is something that seems all too common these days and looks dreadful.
Last edited by Jock Scot; 4th January 16 at 05:25 AM.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
-
5th January 16, 05:11 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by freddie
What an array of tartans due to amalgamation! Cameron of Erracht kilts and plaids (Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders), Gordon pipe bags (Gordon Highlanders) and Mackenzie ribbons (Seaforth Highlanders ).
It was sad, in a way, for the creation of The Highlanders to finally put the kibosh on the Prince Charles Edward Stuart tartan of the old 72nd Highlanders.
The pipers of the Seaforth Highlanders, and then the pipers of the Queens Own Highlanders, wore a rear ribbon of that tartan for nearly a century (1881-1994).
Last edited by OC Richard; 5th January 16 at 05:13 AM.
Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte
-
-
5th January 16, 07:05 AM
#10
[QUOTE=OC Richard;1309740]It was sad, in a way, for the creation of The Highlanders to finally put the kibosh on the Prince Charles Edward Stuart tartan of the old 72nd Highlanders.
The pipers of the Seaforth Highlanders, and then the pipers of the Queens Own Highlanders, wore a rear ribbon of that tartan for nearly a century (1881-1994).
I love the Prince Charles Edward Stuart tartan (not as bright as classic Royal Stewart) and I'm hoping to buy a kilt in this tartan in the summer. Marton Mills do a nice version in their Jura range but worryingly it's not showing on their website anymore. The only other mill weaving it in heavyweight is Dalgliesh, but I couldn't afford that one
The Kilt is my delight !
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks