|
-
5th March 10, 04:01 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by Jock Scot
I say steady on there! Some will find comments like that offensive. Me for one! 
Jock, you must also accept that some people find such positions of power offensive.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom -- for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
-
-
5th March 10, 04:43 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by Paul
Jock, you must also accept that some people find such positions of power offensive.
Paul, I think that if you look very carefully, you will find that the Earl of Wessex has no position of power at all. He does, on the other hand, have a position of privilege, into which he was born. Neither he, nor you, nor I could choose our parents. How can the accident of birth be offensive? It is like blaming a child for having the wrong colour of eyes or skin.
Regards
Chas
-
-
5th March 10, 04:54 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by Chas
Paul, I think that if you look very carefully, you will find that the Earl of Wessex has no position of power at all. He does, on the other hand, have a position of privilege, into which he was born. Neither he, nor you, nor I could choose our parents. How can the accident of birth be offensive? It is like blaming a child for having the wrong colour of eyes or skin.
Regards
Chas
Chas, I realise my comment was a little intentionally vague, but I never meant that at all.
I was directing my argument to the state of privileges and how these can be refused, therefore this is very much different to someone being born with an inherited physical feature.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom -- for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
-
-
6th March 10, 02:00 AM
#4
 Originally Posted by Paul
Jock, you must also accept that some people find such positions of power offensive.
I do indeed understand that and I have some sympathy for that point, however there are ways of voicing those opinions in a courteous way. I may also add that there are those of us who consider positions of power and privilege can, in the right circumstances, be used for good purposes. As in this case. Why be so grudging about it?
Last edited by Jock Scot; 6th March 10 at 01:37 PM.
Reason: more thumbs than fingers.
-
-
6th March 10, 06:00 AM
#5
The pros and cons about power and privilege etc. are not appropriate to this thread.
Most countries have a "first family" in one form or another. As Jock has hinted, ours has a concept of noblesse oblige and work hard in varying kinds of service.
Some of them wear the kilt in circumstances that are considered appropriate to the occasion. Some of us think that this particular occasion is very appropriate.
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
Similar Threads
-
By GMan in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 5
Last Post: 20th November 09, 12:18 PM
-
By Jeff in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 4
Last Post: 24th November 08, 06:54 PM
-
By Jaggy thistle in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 14
Last Post: 28th October 08, 09:34 AM
-
By Derek in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 29
Last Post: 25th May 07, 06:18 AM
-
By Kilted Taper in forum USA Kilts
Replies: 2
Last Post: 18th September 06, 10:42 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks